Identity elements
Reference code
Name and location of repository
Level of description
Title
Date(s)
- 1915 May 21 (Creation)
Extent
2 pages
Name of creator
Name of creator
Content and structure elements
Scope and content
R.F. Pettigrew writes to H.L. Loucks concerning the Richards Law and current referendum in the State legislature. Pettigrew believes that Richards must go alone while still arguing for Primary Law. Pettigrew also mentions the continued desire to buy a newspaper though expresses his inability to do so with current funds.
System of arrangement
Conditions of access and use elements
Conditions governing access
Physical access
Technical access
Conditions governing reproduction
Languages of the material
Scripts of the material
Language and script notes
Finding aids
Acquisition and appraisal elements
Custodial history
Immediate source of acquisition
Appraisal, destruction and scheduling information
Accruals
Related materials elements
Existence and location of originals
Existence and location of copies
Related archival materials
Related descriptions
Notes element
General note
TRANSCRIPT
R. F. Pettigrew
Sioux Falls, S. D.
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, May 21, 1915.H. L. Loucks,
Watertown, S. D.My Dear Friend:-
I have been away about a month and on returning I find your letter of April 19th, and do not know if I have answered it or not.
I do not know whether Richards has gone into court with regard to the Primary Law or not. I received a letter from him saying he would be glad if I would assist in a financial way in carrying on a suit. I had written him that I wanted to assist. Richards really has at issue now. The question whether the legislature can defeat or ignore the constitution & defeat the referendum or not is to be determined. Of course I care nothing about the primary law, I really voted against it when it was adopted.
I do not believe Richards will come to us. He has set notions. He is opposed to the single tax, and as far as I am concerned he will have to go it alone, if he insists upon sticking to his one issue the primary law. I am going to try and have a talk with him, however, and see what can be done.
Of course we must have a newspaper. The newspaper editors of this state are as rotten a lot of brainless asses as it would be possible to get together. I am afraid I am not going to get Scripts to come in.
I think you had better accept Hampton’s proposition, providing he has backing so that you are sure of your compensation. You can do splendid work from that standpoint.
Now with regard to the buying of the newspaper, it is impossible for me to do it at the present time. I have all that I can take care of and have been hoping conditions would change so that we could accomplish something.
Yours truly,
R. F. Pettigrew >