Correspondence

Letter: R.F. Pettigrew to H.L. Loucks, November 20, 1915

Identity elements

Reference code

8

Level of description

Item

Title

Correspondence

Date(s)

  • 1915 November 20 (Creation)

Extent

3 pages

Name of creator

Content and structure elements

Scope and content

R.F. Pettigrew discusses with H.L. Loucks his disagreement with Richard O. Richards and his most recent proposition of an income tax. Pettigrew mentions that he would join Richard O. Richards if he organized an independent movement that was not reliant on any of the current political parties. Pettigrew expresses his aspiration to build up either a progressive or people's party that supported the workers.

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use elements

Conditions governing access

Physical access

Technical access

Conditions governing reproduction

Languages of the material

Scripts of the material

Language and script notes

Finding aids

Acquisition and appraisal elements

Custodial history

Immediate source of acquisition

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling information

Accruals

Related materials elements

Existence and location of originals

Existence and location of copies

Related archival materials

Related descriptions

Notes element

General note

TRANSCRIPT

R. F. Pettigrew
Sioux Falls, SD
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, November 20, 1915.

H. L. Loucks,
Watertown, S. D.

My Dear Friend: -

Your letters of November 12th and 5th, duly received.

Someone sent me Burkholder’s article on Richards from Huron and I have read it. I have never agreed with Richards, in fact had an argument with him about his taxations, he proposes to make the laborers who earn a dollar or two a day pay an income tax on their gross earnings, and of course no one can follow him on such a proposition as that, and when I tried to tell him that the single tax was the thing, he flew off the handle entirely and said it dignified labor to make them pay taxes on their wages.

I shall go with Richards if he organizes an entirely independent movement, but I cant have nothing to do with the Republican primaries, although they are just as good as the democrats. I am opposed to his primary law because I think it is a scheme to perpetuate party government, and the machine can capture the party government just as easily as they can capture the government. They can adopt themselves to any primary. The fact of the matter is that Richards is off, on an inconsequential program. I shall probably vote for his primary law as a rebuke to the miserable gang that are running the state government. But of course it would be impossible for anybody who think at all to follow Richards, besides he will not consult on any subject with anybody. How therefore can anyone work with him, and yet I want to because he is honest and capable.

Your lecture at the union service of the Christian Endeavor Society is a very interesting document, and I have read it with much care. But how could you expect a lot of preachers who are giving their entire attention to see how they can keep out of hell from bothering their heads with trying to escape hell here on earth. Hell hereafter is what they are afraid of.

I note your remark that if we could get rid of Roosevelt, we could build up a progressive party. I am of the impression that the only party worth building up is a peoples party composed of those who do the work and produce the wealth of a nation excluding from it all the exploiters of labor and that the campaign ought to be for the public ownership of the land and all utilities and that the method of acquiring all these things should be by appropriating them to the use of the public without compensating their present owners. These things were not produced by their present owners, they were produced by the population in the aggregate and were taken from those who produced them by the cunning and the strong through their control of these same utilities and their control of the government. A political party of this sort would be worth joining but a political party like the progressive party which tries to correct some of the most flagrant abuses and perpetuate the existing system which is in the aggregate immoral and wrong, is in my opinion not worth while.

I suppose I shall be in Sioux Falls until after the first of January.

Yours truly,

R. F. Pettigrew

Specialized notes

Alternative identifier(s)

Description control element

Rules or conventions

Sources used

Access points

Place access points

Genre access points

Digital object metadata

Filesize

60.8 KiB

Uploaded

February 24, 2021 8:07 AM

Digital object (External URI) rights area

Digital object (Reference) rights area

Digital object (Thumbnail) rights area

Accession area