Correspondence

Letter: H.L. Loucks to R.F. Pettigrew, November 14, 1915

Identity elements

Reference code

B01-F03-I13

Level of description

Item

Title

Correspondence

Date(s)

  • 1915 November 14 (Creation)

Extent

1 page

Name of creator

Content and structure elements

Scope and content

H.L. Loucks writes about his misgivings of Richard O. Richards and his views on taxation and temperance. Loucks does not trust Richards and is hesitant to write an article for him that Richards would want published in local newspapers.

System of arrangement

Conditions of access and use elements

Conditions governing access

Physical access

Technical access

Conditions governing reproduction

Languages of the material

Scripts of the material

Language and script notes

Finding aids

Custodial history

Immediate source of acquisition

Appraisal, destruction and scheduling information

Accruals

Related materials elements

Existence and location of originals

Existence and location of copies

Related archival materials

Related descriptions

Notes element

General note

TRANSCRIPT

Nov. 14th.

Friend Pettigrew,

Since writing you I have read “Alf. Burkholder” in the A-L. I know that you are not a very close reader of that great educational journal, but I want you to read that article; all of it.

Of course Alf. writes just what he is paid for, and Richards pays that bill. I have had two letters from him lately wanting me to write an article for the dailies on the late judicial decision, but as intimated to you in my last, I had grave doubts of Richards. I will not blindly follow. I am very glad now that I hesitated, much as I would like to give expression to my opinion of the judicial decision.

His position, by any means. Exemption of personal property and improvements is all right, but he should stop there for the present.

But just why he should at this time inject a new idea into the temperance question is beyond my comprehension.

He cannot hope to compete with Egan for the saloon vote, and if he goes into the republican as his late advice suggested, it would easily place him third.

But then comes up another contradiction in which he favors a fusion organization. That would sound like an independent movement.

There is very little in his platform as outlined in that article that appeals to me. He is not a safe leader.

I warned him that injection of new matter in his initiated Bill would endanger the whole proposition, and urged him to make two Bills if he wished to save his primary law, but he would not listen to me.

I think that I will delay writing him until I hear from him.

Sincerely yours,

H.L. Loucks

Specialized notes

Alternative identifier(s)

Item Identifier

MA 23 H.L. Loucks Correspondence with R.F. Pettigrew Box 1 Folder 3 Item 13

Description control element

Rules or conventions

Sources used

Access points

Place access points

Genre access points

Digital object metadata

Media type

Text

Filesize

59 KiB

Uploaded

February 24, 2021 6:44 AM

Digital object (External URI) rights area

Digital object (Reference) rights area

Digital object (Thumbnail) rights area

Accession area